META ANALYSIS
THE LANCET:
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Ameta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials
The Lancet, September 20, Vol. 350, 1997
http://www.chalmersresearch.com/bmg/docs/t3a1.pdf21. Dean M. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than
objectivity? Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 1998;4(4):389-398.
Feder G, Katz T. Randomised controlled trials for homoeopathy. British Medical Journal
2002;324(7336):498-499.
57. Linde K, Hondras M, Vickers A, ter Riet G, Melchart D. Systematic reviews of
complementary therapies: an annotated biobliography. Part 3: homeopathy. BMC
Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2001;1:4.
58. Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Willich S. The methodological quality of randomized
controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. International Journal
of Epidemiology 2001;30(3):526-531.
59. Linde K, Melchart D. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a
state-of-the-art review. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
1998;4(4):371-388.
Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. Br Med J (1991) 302 316-323. Criterion-based systematic review of 107 controlled clinical trials of homoeopathy. Positive conclusions.
Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
Cucherat M, Haugh M C, Gooch M, Boissel J P
Authors' objectives: To establish, using a systematic review and meta-analysis, whether there is any evidence from randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of the efficacy of homeopathic treatment in patients with any disease.
http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ShowRecord.asp?View=Full&ID=12000001151